US-Canadian native alliance promises to block pipelines

Date of publication: 
21 March 2013

An alliance of ten native groups from Canada and the United States says that it is determined to stop the Keystone, Enbridge and Kinder Morgan pipelines, using “physical action” if necessary.

A Reuters article on Monday entitled “Canada aboriginal movement poses new threat to miners,” has proven timely as this week native groups in the Canadian provinces of Quebec and Newfoundland filed a $900 million lawsuit against the Iron Ore Company of Canada (IOC), of which Rio Tinto is the majority shareholder.

This latest vow to block all three multibillion-dollar pipelines is part of the broader “Idle No More” movement which has gained momentum in Canada since its inception in November of last year.

The movement is increasingly seen as a threat to Canada’s coveted status as a low-risk jurisdiction for mining and energy projects.

For better or worse, Canada’s economy currently depends on revenue from the Alberta oil sands, which is in decline as a result of pipeline “bottlenecks” that reduce the flow of Canadian petroleum to refineries in the US and around the world.

The native alliance, whose territories are either on or near the oil sands or pipeline routes, says that their rights are being ignored by the respective federal governments and that the proposed pipelines would contribute negatively to climate change.

The Canadian native bands within the international alliance also claim that:

The Canadian government is ignoring treaties signed with native bands in the 18th and 19th centuries. These agreements, they say, give aboriginal groups a major say in what happens on their territories.

“They’ve been stealing from us for the last 200 years … now they’re going to destroy our land? We’re not going to let that happen,” said Martin Louie of the Nadleh Whut’en First Nation in British Columbia.

“If we have to go to court, if we have to stand in front of any of their machines that are going to take the oil through, we are going to do that. We’re up against a wall here. We have nowhere else to go.”

The three pipelines in question:

  • TransCanada Corp’s Keystone XL to Texas, which is awaiting approval from Washington
  • Enbridge Inc’s Northern Gateway to the Pacific Coast, which if built will help export oil to China
  • Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP’s plans to more than double the capacity of its existing Trans Mountain pipeline to Vancouver


First Nations say they will fight oilsands, pipeline

20 March 2013

Canadian and U.S. aboriginal leaders in Ottawa promise legal challenge, other measures

‘We have to wake up to the crazy decisions that this government’s making to change the world in a negative way.‘—Chief Reuben George, Tsleil-Waututh First Nation

An alliance of First Nations leaders is preparing to fight proposed new pipelines in the courts and through unspecified direct action.

Native leaders from Canada and the United States were on Parliament Hill on Wednesday to underline opposition to both the Northern Gateway and Keystone XL pipelines.

The first would tie the Alberta oil sands to the West Coast, while the second would send bitumen to refineries on the American Gulf Coast.

Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver said the federal government is consulting with First Nations, and is ready to hear their concerns.

“We’re making every effort to respond to the concerns we have heard on the West Coast,” he said after a caucus meeting.

“I’ve had quite a few conversations with aboriginal leaders and aboriginal people. And I’ve found those conversations very constructive. They want to do the best for their communities and we want to do the best for their communities as well. So I remain very hopeful.”

Speaking to CBC News, Oliver said there was an “enormous economic benefit” at stake for First Nations.

“There is an opportunity to transform many aboriginal communities which have been suffering from high unemployment for far too long,” he said. “There is an opportunity for jobs, for economic activity, for equity participation, and I would hope that when they see that there isn’t an environmental risk that they would embrace these opportunities for their communities.”

Oliver said the government supports peaceful protests as part of a democracy, but “we do expect people to live within the confines of the law.”

Chiefs brush off federal appointment

Some of the chiefs brushed off the federal government’s appointment this week of a special envoy to look at tensions between natives and the energy industry.

Vancouver-based lawyer Doug Eyford is to focus on energy infrastructure in Western Canada, but some native leaders say he has no credibility.

He is to examine First Nations concerns about the troubled Northern Gateway proposal, as well as the development of liquid natural gas plants, marine terminals and other energy infrastructure in British Columbia and Alberta.

He will discuss environmental protection, jobs and economic development, and First Nations rights to a share of the wealth from natural resources.

“He’s going to be reaching out to find out more about their interests and their concerns and to look for ways that resource development can help improve the lives of aboriginals, create more employment, create more opportunities for communities,” Oliver said.

Some native chiefs, however, said Eyford has already failed. Although he is also the federal government’s chief negotiator on comprehensive land claims, they said he hasn’t accomplished much on that file.

Chief Allan Adam of the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation said natives are determined to block the pipelines.

“It’s going to be a long, hot summer,” he said at a news conference.

“We have a lot of issues at stake.”

‘We’re going to stop these pipelines.’

Phil Lane Jr. of the American Yankton Sioux, said native groups south of the border will stand with their Canadian cousins.

“We’re going to stop these pipelines on way or another,” he said.

Chief Martin Louie of the Nadleh Whut’en First Nation in northern B.C., said the pipeline opponents will never back down.

“If we have to keep going to court, we’ll keep doing that,” he said.

He said the stakes are high and go beyond native issues.

“We’re the ones that’s going to save whatever we have left of this Earth,” he said.

Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt said he hopes no one resorts to violent confrontation.

“The rule of law applies,” he said. “We are free to express our opinions. That’s the genius of Canada but we do it within the respect of the rule of law. I think they will do that. I hope so.”

Chief Reuben George of the Tsleil-Waututh First Nation on Vancouver Island said it’s time to act against the federal government’s resource development agenda.

“We, as a nation, have to wake up,” he said. “We have to wake up to the crazy decisions that this government’s making to change the world in a negative way.”

Valcourt said it’s not an either-or argument: “This is about responsible development. I think we have the genius in Canada to be able to develop our natural resources while protecting our environment.”